The Immaturity Keeping Alexander Mogilny Out Of The Hockey Hall Of Fame - An Article By Kevin Wong

Rating:
5/5,
  1. chizzler

    chizzler Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    9,100
    Likes Received:
    1,594
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Great article. Best I’ve read in a while.
     
    ZeroPucksGiven likes this.
  2. wetcoast

    wetcoast Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2018
    Messages:
    4,980
    Likes Received:
    1,380
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Gender:
    Male
    Looking back at some of the winger inductions into the HHOF post expansion and Mogliny certainly doesn't look out of place with Andreychuk, Ciccarelli, Gartner, Anderson, Barber, Gillies, Shutt and even Rod Gilbert (who had most of his priem post expansion).

    People act as if the bar is Bossy or Lafleur when in fact it's really rather low.

    Personally I'd rather put in Middleton or even John Tonelli as wingers before Mogliny but I think Mogliny does have a pretty legit argument.

    That being said the argument to keep him out is a bit stronger, despite recent past "mistake" inductions into the HHOF.
     
  3. Perfect_Drug

    Perfect_Drug Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    10,000
    Likes Received:
    3,660
    Trophy Points:
    202
    Occupation:
    3D Character Artist
    Location:
    Montreal
    Except he totally should.

    4th in all-time Playoff Scoring.
    5th in all-time playoff goals
    5th most all-time Playoff Game Winning Goals

    Anyone who watched the Oilers dynasty knows how instrumental Anderson was in winning all of those cups.

    Anderson was the reason we beat the Bruins in the Finals in 88.
    And even without Gretzky, Anderson was an absolute force when they won the cup in 1990.


    You can only count out Anderson if you don't think Playoffs count for anything.
     
    Boris Zubov and Sentinel like this.
  4. tarheelhockey

    tarheelhockey Highest Boss

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    62,454
    Likes Received:
    50,698
    Trophy Points:
    195
    Location:
    The Triangle

    Anderson was a Mullen, Ciccarelli level scorer who happened to play in the most favorable circumstances possible. Put him on literally any other team and you're talking about a guy who's only occasionally remembered when talking about that era. Trumpeting him as the 4th best playoff scorer of all time looks great until you realize that 1-4 are his own teammates. Making him the 4th best playoff scorer on his own team.

    Inducting guys like Anderson is how you get Joe Nieuwendyk in the HOF. And Nieuwendyk opens the door for even more mediocrity. Eventually we are going to end up with Claude Lemieux and this sequence of logic is the reason why.
     
  5. senior edler

    senior edler your alternate captain

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    8,692
    Likes Received:
    2,794
    Trophy Points:
    126
    That was Kevin too, no?
     
  6. Cursed Lemon

    Cursed Lemon Registered Bruiser

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    8,923
    Likes Received:
    1,169
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dey-Twah, MI
    He won one Rocket, was bad in the postseason, only had five seasons where he was meaningfully above PPG, only has two - two - top-10 scoring finishes, was 14th in PPG from 1992 to 2003, and was defensively uh...pedestrian.

    If you want to induct him on the premise that he was the original defector, I could get behind that, but his actual hockey resume? His only case is that Dino Ciccarelli is in the HOF.
     
    The Macho Man likes this.
  7. Perfect_Drug

    Perfect_Drug Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    10,000
    Likes Received:
    3,660
    Trophy Points:
    202
    Occupation:
    3D Character Artist
    Location:
    Montreal
    Yeah.. The 4th best playoff scorer on what is widely considered to be the best team of all time.


    Here's another team that had multiple Hall of Famers:
    Detroit Red Wings 2001-02 roster and scoring statistics at hockeydb.com

    Do you believe everyone outside of their top 3 scorers shouldn't be in the HHOF?

    Anderson is the 4th highest Playoff Scorer of all time.
    That's literally the end of the entire discussion.

    Neither Joey Mullen's, or Nieuwendyk's playoff resumes resemble anything close to Andersons.
    Anderson has DOUBLE their playoff points.
     
    Boris Zubov and Sentinel like this.
  8. theVladiator

    theVladiator Registered User

    Joined:
    May 26, 2018
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    324
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Gender:
    Male
    Great article. Do not like the title though, I do not think the picture article is painting is that of an immature person. Mogilny comes across as hard-headed, stubborn, honest and private person. Not what I would call immature. "Mogilny: hockey on his own terms" may be a better title (from my point of view at least). Gotta say, the article gave me some newfound respect for the guy. On the HOF question, I am not sure I care too much.

    Others may disagree with that, but that's also in part why I think the article is great - it's not agenda driven, it lets the story speak for itself through facts and contemporary quotes.
     
    Jedub likes this.
  9. frisco

    frisco Some people claim that there's a woman to blame...

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2017
    Messages:
    1,479
    Likes Received:
    661
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Northern Hemisphere
    Gotta have Steve Shutt on the list:

    817 points in 930 games a lot of which was during the highest scoring era ever.

    One Top Ten points/goals/points-per-game finish. All in 76-77.

    Four point/game seasons.

    Highest trophy finish: 11th (Lady Byng).

    Spent the majority of his career on a line with two HOFers.

    My Best-Carey
     
  10. supsens

    supsens Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,447
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Umm only 3 humans have managed to put up more points playing D in the NHL than Housley did. 3
    Lol so far from the ‘worst players’ list its crazy
     
  11. I am toxic

    I am toxic Nine drums full

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2014
    Messages:
    2,712
    Likes Received:
    2,447
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Location:
    Vancouver
    May have already been said - Bure and Federov are in, Mogilny has to be in.

    Even Dino and Shanny are in.

    Not a good look for the HHoF.
     
  12. The Macho Man

    The Macho Man Lusty Bodychecker

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,245
    Likes Received:
    15,012
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Bure and Federov were markedly better than Mogilny.

    Dino? Eh, you have a point there. Shanahan does have 3 post-season All-Stars, although he shouldn't be in either so that's fine.

    We need to start knocking people out of the Hall.
     
  13. I am toxic

    I am toxic Nine drums full

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2014
    Messages:
    2,712
    Likes Received:
    2,447
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Location:
    Vancouver
    I think Bure and Federov were better, but won't go as far to say "markedly" better for Bure - if he hadn't suffered injury problems then yeah Bure would have ended up being markedly better. But you make a good point.
     
  14. tarheelhockey

    tarheelhockey Highest Boss

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    62,454
    Likes Received:
    50,698
    Trophy Points:
    195
    Location:
    The Triangle
    Funny enough, all three played at the exact same time as Housley. That’s what happens when scoring is way higher than any other period in history.

    The difference between those guys and Housley is they actually played defense, while he ran around as a 4th forward. Even Paul Coffey was a better defender, and that’s saying something. Those other 3 guys won multiple Norris trophies, while Housley was a finalist all of 1 time. They played meaningful roles in Cup runs and gold medals and President’s Trophies. Housley was bad in the playoffs and scored a lot of meaningless points.

    If Paul Coffey was his generation’s Erik Karlsson, the best comparison for Housley would be Keith Yandle. Look at a post-lockout scoring list and he looks impressive. Actually watch him play, and try to think of his most memorable moments, and the HOF conversation goes sideways really quickly.
     
  15. supsens

    supsens Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,447
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Yes only a couple guys won the Norris big whoop, it’s not really something people can ’win’ the best Dman doesn’t always win the award. Not saying he should have won one, but back in the day people were probably voting without even seeing everyone play.
    Fact is the HHOF is a record keeping building, it isn’t to give trophy winners more props its to keep an official record of who has done what and when your a top 5 producer at your position in history it would be fairly crappy record keeping to leave that guy out. Gretz and Mario won all the awards for years, it would be a empty ass hall if everyone for those 20 years were left out other than them. And no Yandle and his 550 points isn’t even close to 1200+
     
  16. Highmarker

    Highmarker Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,963
    Likes Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    95
    if you compare Mogilny and Bure their stats are similar.
     
  17. ElysiumAB

    ElysiumAB Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2013
    Messages:
    3,839
    Likes Received:
    2,384
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Gender:
    Male
    Cliff notes:

    Two Wongs don't a right.
     
  18. Mogo

    Mogo #GameOver

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    18,503
    Likes Received:
    1,623
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Home Page:
    Mogo should be in the HHOF for sure
     
  19. tarheelhockey

    tarheelhockey Highest Boss

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    62,454
    Likes Received:
    50,698
    Trophy Points:
    195
    Location:
    The Triangle
    The Norris voters were absolutely not voting without seeing everyone play. You realize it’s not a fan ballot, right? Even the west coast journalists were seeing Housley play a minimum of 3 full games a year. Division rivals more like 8.

    And that’s not counting playoff games (which is probably a good thing for Housley).


    Then he can rightfully enjoy a prominent place in the media guide and the US Hockey Hall of Fame, where he is relevant. Compared to other HOCKEY Hall of Famers, he’s an extremely weak pick. Arguably the weakest defenseman to make it since about 1950.

    Yandle occupies a similar scoring rank in his generation (only 7 points shy of an identical 4th place) with a similarly empty resume in every other aspect. Boosting Housley for his point total without acknowledging the difference in scoring rates in the 1980s and early 1990s is a bad-faith argument, like saying Mogilny > Ovechkin because Ovie never scored 73 goals.
     
  20. supsens

    supsens Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,447
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Yes I know who votes, but without the tv coverage and internet of today it’s tough to watch everyone. And yep 3 games you can easily decide who is the best on that sample size right?
    On top of that I’m not sure every team played each other 3 times a year, anddd never mind the poor coverage where reporters wouldn’t go on every road trip or bother going to every game.
    Fact only 2 Americans have more points
    Fact only 3 dmen have more points.
    That’s a big deal. And one hell of an accomplishment.
    Competing against those other couple guys who are known to be among the best of all time does not mean you don’t deserve what you earn.
    You do understand they need more than six guys in an entire building dedicated to the history of hockey right?
    His name has been written on a NHL scoresheet how many times?
    Oh so anyone not as good or coffey and Bourque need not apply cool.
    He earned his spot, deal with it

    Oh and your ridiculous ovechkin point...what? Who did I say he is better than, nice made up point on a made up argument what are you even talking about?
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2019
  21. aufheben

    aufheben as if

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2013
    Messages:
    43,250
    Likes Received:
    11,810
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    New Jersey
    It’s Fedorov.
     
    Sentinel likes this.
  22. Grantham

    Grantham Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    59
    I still remember when the Canucks got him. I was just a lad. I was in hockey heaven when I'd get to watch him and Bure play togehter, it still brings a smile to my face :)

    When he was inspired, he could be better than Bure or any other player of that time. What a magical talent, and I loved his honesty and vulnerability. He was flawed, and he didn't really try to hide it. But when he was on, oh my!

    Great article in OP. One of the best hockey articles I've ever had the privilege of reading anywhere. Bravo!
     
  23. Sentinel

    Sentinel Registered User

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    8,884
    Likes Received:
    1,542
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Home Page:
    I would much, much rather have Anderson both on my team and in the Hall of Fame than Mogilny with all his ungodly talent.
     
    tarheelhockey likes this.
  24. tarheelhockey

    tarheelhockey Highest Boss

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    62,454
    Likes Received:
    50,698
    Trophy Points:
    195
    Location:
    The Triangle
    3 full games is more than most people see of any non-conference opponent with the current schedule.

    And 1990 was not 1950. There were national broadcasts and highlight shows covering only 21 teams. Realistically a full time hockey journalist was seeing more of Housley in 1990 Buffalo than he would have seen Yandle in 2010 Arizona.

    They did.

    Continuing to push raw stats as if the scoring rate hasn’t changed since 1985 isn’t fooling anybody.

    The point is obvious. 73 goals in 1993 does not have the same value as 73 goals in 2019. Housley’s points totals are not comparable to points scored 2000-2019. And for that matter the same goes for Anderson.

    Name a worse defenseman in the HOF since 1960.
     
    mrhockey193195 likes this.
  25. supsens

    supsens Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,447
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Hockey is about raw stats, he is a top producer of all time. That is why he is in the NHL HOF
    People that know a lot more about hockey and the hall of fame agree with me, that’s why he is there and you are wrong.
    Your argument’s have been proven wrong before you even spoke.
    Sooo ya
    And lol at being able to see more hockey in the 90’s. That’s just silly, I can see more on YouTube right now than all the 90’s combined.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"